K.K.SRIVASTAVA, DEVINDERJIT DHATT, S.P.KAPOOR
DATA MANAGEMENT SERVICE – Appellant
Versus
H. C. GUPTA – Respondent
Mr. Justice K.K. Srivastava, President—Heard the learned Counsel for the appellant, namely, M/s. Data Management Service and the respondent/complainant No. 1, Sh. H.C. Gupta. We have also gone through the impugned order dated 17.6.2002 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-II, U.T., Chandigarh (for short hereinafter to be referred as the District Forum-II) in Complaint Case No. 1037 of 1999, vide which the complaint was allowed and the appellant/O.P. was directed to take back the defective monitor from the complainant/respondent and refund Rs. 10,215/- to the complainant with interest @ 9% p.a. from the date of its purchase till payment. The appellant/O.P. was also directed to refund to the complainant Rs. 3,000/- as costs of JBL Speakers and was further directed to pay interest @ 9% p.a. from the date of purchase of the JBL Speakers till payment. Additionally, Rs. 2,000/- were awarded as compensation for mental and physical harassment and Rs. 500/- as expenses of litigation.
2. Mr. Ashok Jain, Advocate appearing for the appellant made the only submission that the appellant could not file its defence version before the District Forum-II which struck off it
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.