K.C.BHARGAVA, D.D.BAHUGUNA, RACHNA
VINOD KUMARI SRIVASTAVA – Appellant
Versus
HINDUSTAN AERONAUTICS LTD. – Respondent
Mr. D.D. Bahuguna, Sr. Member—This is an appeal against the judgment and order dated 28.8.12001 passed by District Consumer Forum, Kanpur Dehat in Complaint Case No. 952 of 1999.
2. The brief facts of the case are that the husband of the complainant, Smt. Vinod Kumari Srivastava, is a permanent employee of the Hindustan Aeronautics Limited, Kanpur and is entitled to free medical treatment through HAL Dispensary there. The husband of the complainant Sri Bajrang Bahadur Srivastava, all of a sudden fell sick and was taken to the HAL Hospital at 3.30 a.m.on 10.7.1994. No doctor was available in the dispensary. The Medical Superintendent of the opposite party reached the dispensary two hours late and in the meantime the condition of the complainant’s husband deteriorated. He was later on referred to the Institute of Cardiology at Kanpur by the HAL Hospital authorities. It has been alleged that in case the complainant’s husband had been attended to promptly then he would not have suffered heart attack for which the complainant had to spend a lot of money in the treatment. Therefore, the doctors in the HAL Hospital are responsible and are liable for negligence as a result of which her
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.