K.D.SHAHI, SURENDRA KUMAR, LUXMI SINGH
KUMUD GARG – Appellant
Versus
RAJA BHATIA – Respondent
Mr. Justice K.D. Shahi, Chairman—These are two connected appeals one by Dr. Kumud Garg (hereinafter called the appellant) and the other by Sh. Raja Bhatia (hereinafter called the complainant) arising out of judgment and order dated 31.5.2000 whereby the learned Forum has allowed the compensation of Rs. 50,000/- plus Rs. 10,000/- and Rs. 2,000/- as cost of litigation against appellants. While the complainant has filed the appeal for the enhancement of the compensation so granted. Both the appeals arise out of the same judgment and order, therefore, both are taken together for disposal.
2. The brief facts of the case are that the complainant has taken his daughter Kajal of the age of two and a half years to the opposite party for operation of her right eye. According to the complainant Dr. Kumud Garg was working with Shri Ganga Mata Charitable Eye Hospital and Research Institute, Saptrishi Link Road, Haridwar, opposite party No. 2. It is said that the vision in both the eyes was proper but there was some pressure in the right eye for which the complainant had taken his daughter Kajal for treatment to the appellants. After examination Dr. Kumud Garg told that the eye is to be oper
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.