SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

M.A.A.KHAN, RATAN PRAKASH
RAJENDRA KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsels for the Parties :
For the Complainant/Appellant : In Person.
For the Opposite Parties/Respondents: None

ORDER

Mr. Ratan Prakash, Member—This appeal is directed against the order of the learned District Forum, Jaipur-I dated 15.9.2001 whereby the complaint filed by the appellant has been dismissed.

2. Facts relevant for disposal of this appeal in brief are that the appellant applied to the respondent (JDA) for allotment of a residential plot measuring 162 sq. mtrs. under the Kardhani Scheme (II Phase) located at Saligrampura, Jaipur by depositing an amount of Rs. 15,000/- on 31.12.1996. On a draw of lot by the respondent, the appellant was allotted residential plot No. A-200 in the aforesaid scheme and was accordingly required to pay a total amount of Rs. 74,639/- in four instalments. The appellant, it is alleged, deposited the aforesaid instalments by February, 1998 whereupon the respondent issued a allotment letter in favour of the appellant on 13.4.1999.

3. It is the grievance of the appellant that after allotment of the said plot when he visited the site he found that as per notification published by the respondent no basic facilities and amenities such as garden, drinking water, distribution of electricity, laying down of sewerage, shops, school and hospital, etc. were provided on










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top