SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

K.C.BHARGAVA, D.D.BAHUGUNA, RACHNA
DHRUWA NARAIN SHUKLA – Appellant
Versus
LUKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsels for the Parties :
For the Appellant :Mr. A.C. Misra, Advocate.
For the Respondents: None.

ORDER

Mr. Justice K.C. Bhargava, President—This is an appeal against the judgment and order dated 5.5.1998 passed by District Consumer Forum-II, Lucknow in Complaint Case No. 160/1994.

2. The facts of the case stated in brief are that the complainant applied for a single storey house in Tikait-Rai-Talab Scheme of the Lucknow Development Authority. The complainant received an allotment letter dated 24.4.1989 by which the complainant was allotted house No. 613/11. He was to deposit the rest of the amount of Rs. 79,500/- in quarterly instalments. The instalments were of Rs. 13,250/-. In all a sum of Rs. 84,500/- had been deposited by the complainant. The complainant has not been given possession of the house and the registration of sale deed has also not been done so far. The complainant met the officials several times and met representatives of the Lucknow Development Authority for possession of house No. 613/11 but no heed was paid. Ultimately the complainant went to the premises and found that unauthorised possession has been taken by some other persons and they are living in that house. The complainant informed this fact to the Lucknow Development Authority. Thereafter by lett














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top