M.A.A.KHAN, SUSHMA TANWAR
SUNIL KUMAR NANDAWAT – Appellant
Versus
CASTROL INDIA LTD. – Respondent
Mr. Justice M.A.A. Khan, President—Heard. This revision petition is treated as an appeal under Section 15 of the C.P. Act, 1986.
2. The Forum has dismissed the complaint of the appellant on the short ground of non-joinder of necessary/proper parties to the complaint. The appellant had become a member of sales promotion scheme promulgated by M/s. Castrol India Ltd., the respondent, through their agent Harsh Automobiles, Bhilwara. Under the scheme, in the event of winning the prize, he was entitled to prize of a scooter. Although he became entitled to such prize, as is his case, the respondent declined to deliver the prize to him. The appellant filed complaint against M/s. Castrol India Ltd. without making M/s. Harsh Automobiles, Bhilwara as party to the complaint. The Forum held that M/s. Harsh Automobiles, Bhilwara was a necessary party to the complaint to decide the issues between the parties justly and rightly. The Forum accordingly dismissed the complaint. It was urged by the learned Counsel for the appellant that before making the impugned order the Forum did not provide an opportunity to the appellant to array M/s. Harsh Automobiles, Bhilwara as an opposite party to the co
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.