Mr. Justice Palok Basu, President—Mr. Vinay Rathore, learned Counsel for the revisionist states that the case is fixed for arguments on 19.4.2004 before the District Forum, Firozabad and the revision was filed in the office on 4.10.2002 but was not listed so far.

2. Normally notice should have been issued in this revision before final orders are passed but the said course is obviated and the revision is being finally disposed of for the reasons stated hereinafter.

3. It is not denied by the Oriental Insurance Company Limited that the complainant had taken two policies covering two different sets of items after paying separate premiums towards both the policies. A complaint has been filed alleging fire in the factory said to have caused loss. The Insurance Company accepted the claim only to the tune of Rs. 29,136/- whereas the complainant alleged damage to the Plant and Machinery as well as goods and materials which were subject matter of the two respective policies. In the complaint, however, due to the mistake the policy number of one policy alone i.e., 24282/10/91/00337 is mentioned whereas the number of the other policy being 24282/10/91/00099 was inadvertently left out.

4. Th