SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

M.A.A.KHAN, SUSHMA TANWAR
PRABANDHAK, RASHTRIYA BEEJ NIGAM – Appellant
Versus
SATNAM SINGH – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsels for the Parties :
For the Appellant :Mr. Sayyed Zakawat Ali, Advocate.
For the Respondent: None.

ORDER

Mr. Justice M.A.A. Khan, President—On 18.2.1994 Satnam Singh, complainant-respondent, had purchased 1 kg. of primary seed of Musk Melon (Kharbooza) from the appellants at Alwar for Rs. 270/-. He sowed the same in an area of 2 bighas 10 biswas but the seed yielded a crop worth Rs. 1,000/- only as against expected yield worth Rs. 45,000/-. He alleged that the seed was adulterated, sub-standard and of poor quality. He, therefore, claimed Rs. 44,000/- as compensation for loss of crop and Rs. 15,000/- as compensation for mental agony and physical labour put on growing the crop of Musk Melon. The District Forum, partly allowing his Complaint No. 447/94, vide impugned order dated 3.6.1995, awarded to him a sum of Rs. 5,000/- in that behalf and Rs. 200/- as cost of litigation. Hence this appeal by the appellants.

2. Heard the learned Counsel for the appellants and examined the material on record of the Forum.

It is disclosed upon the study of the material on the record of the Forum that intending to produce seed of Musk Melon under the National Seeds Corporation (NSC) Programme, the respondent had entered into an agreement with the appellants on 18.2.1994 to grow Musk Melon and pro







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top