SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

J.D.KAPOOR, RUMNITA MITTAL
ALLAHABAD BANK – Appellant
Versus
KAMLESH KUMAR – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellant :Mr. Shiv Shankar, Advocate.
For the Respondent: In person.

ORDER

Mr. Justice J.D. Kapoor, President—This appeal is directed against order dated 28.6.2002 whereby the appellant was directed to pay 118.53 for the FDR which matured on 21.11.1994 and 452.05 for the two FDs which matured on 8.4.1995 and 13.4.1995. The respondent was also directed to pay compensation of Rs. 5,000/- for the mental agony and Rs. 2,000/- towards costs of litigation.

2. Admittedly the respondent deposited a £ 3124.05 on 21.11.1992 as FD with the appellant at an interest @ 10% for two years compounded every six months. On 19.4.1993 another amount of 10,000/- was deposited on 8.4.1995 at 8% interest p.a. for two years. The amount payable on maturity of FDRs was also mentioned in the FDRs. However, the appellant paid in total less £ 118.53 on FDR which matured on 21.11.1994 than the amount payable as mentioned in FDR.

3. The contention of the appellant is that interest was calculated on the basis of the directions received from the Reserve Bank of India from time-to-time and this fact was in the knowledge of the respondent as it was clearly stipulated in FDR that any interest payable on the deposit was subject to the RBI directives that will be issued from time-to-time.

4.




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top