SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

GUNASEKARAN, A.RAMAN
DEVADOSS – Appellant
Versus
N. ARUMUGAM – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellant :Mr. AR. L. Sundaresan, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. K. Sundaravel, Advocate.

ORDER

Thiru Justice A. Raman, President—The complainant was involved in a road accident and was admitted in the hospital of the opposite party for treatment. The complainant suffered ‘Intra Capsular Fracture Neck of Femur Rt’. Therefore, operation for ‘DHS Fixation C Bone Crafting’ was done. After the fixation of bone crafting, the complainant continued to have pain. There was infection. Though, he again went back to the opposite party, there was no improvement in his condition and, therefore, he went to Kovai Medical Centre. There, it was found that DHS + Fibular Craft had become infected and in the discharge summary of Kovai Medical Centre, we find that X-Ray right hip shows : “Failed DHS — Migration of screw Avascular changes of femoral head early OA changes.” Therefore, removal of DHS plate which was infected and Girdle stone excisional Arthroplasty was done. Thus, from the discharge summary of Kovai Medical Centre, it is clear that the earlier operation done by the opposite party was not properly done in that the screw had come loose. There was infection and there was unhealthy granulation or tissue seropurulent discharge. The Bone and plate were exposed. There was heavy growth





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top