SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SUNIL KUMAR GARG, SUSHMA TANWAR
ASSISTANT ENGINEER – Appellant
Versus
IBRAHIM – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellants :Mr. Purshottam Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Samshudin Ansari, Advocate.

ORDER

Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Garg, President—In this appeal, a preliminary objection has been taken by the learned Counsel appearing for the respondent-complainant to the effect that this appeal deserves to be dismissed as during the pendency of this appeal, the appellants have approached the Hon’ble Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur Bench, Jaipur by way of filing writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India being S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5107/2004 in which parties are the same and that writ petition is pending consideration before the Hon’ble High Court.

2. It may be stated here that the appellants have preferred this appeal against the majority order of the learned District Forum, Swaimadhopur dated 26.9.2002 passed in Complaint Case No. 14/2002 by which the complaint filed by the respondent-complainant was allowed and the appellants were directed to give electric connection to the complainant-respondent within a period of three months.

3. During the pendency of this appeal, on stay application, operation of the impugned majority order of the learned District Forum, Swaimadhopur dated 26.9.2002 was stayed by this State Commission vide order dated 10.10.2003,








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top