SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SUNIL KUMAR GARG, SUSHMA TANWAR
RAMESH CHANDRA VERMA – Appellant
Versus
AEN, PHED – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellant : In person.
For the Respondents:Mr. S.C. Mittal, Advocate.

ORDER

Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Garg, President—This appeal has been filed by the complainant appellant against the order dated 5.6.2003 passed by the District Forum, Dholpur in Complaint Case No. 5.6.2003 by which the complaint of the appellant was dismissed by the District Forum, Dholpur.

2. It may be stated here that the appellant had filed a complaint before the District Forum, Dholpur inter alia stating that he had filed the complaint against XEN and AEN of PHED without making mention through Collector or Government etc. The main case of the complainant was that since he was a consumer of the respondents department but there was so many deficiencies in supplying water to the complainant.

3. A reply was filed by the respondents that water was being supplied properly.

4. After hearing both the parties the District Forum dismissed the complaint inter alia holding that the complainant has failed to prove the fact that dirty water has been supplied by the respondents and further jaundice disease was the direct result of the adulterated water. Aggrieved from that order this appeal has been filed.

5. In this appeal a preliminary objection has been taken by the learned Counsel for the respon









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top