S.N.KAPOOR, P.D.SHENOY
UNION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
VIJAY LAXMI – Respondent
Mr. Justice S.N. Kapoor, Presiding Member—We have heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner on the application for condonation of delay of 65 days as well as on merits
2. This revision is directed against an order passed by the Rajasthan Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Jaipur in Appeal No. 1341 of 2004 dated 28.9.2004 confirming the order of the District Forum.
3. The only ground on which the delay of 65 days is being sought to be condoned is as under:
“That after receiving the certified copy of the order dated 28.9.2004, the petitioner department immediately started the process. The legal opinion was obtained from the Government Counsel immediately thereafter the matter was referred to the Department of Post, Head Quarter, Delhi, thereafter the matter was referred to the Department of Legal Affairs, Ministry of Law and Justice. The Department of Legal Affairs appointed the Government Counsel to pursue the matter and thereafter, the matter has been discussed and the present petition is being prepared. The above mentioned process had taken much time, due to which the accompanying Revision Petition could not be filed within the prescribed period of limitation and some de
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.