V.K.AGRAWAL, VEENA MISRA, R.S.AWASTHI
AMALNDU RUDRA – Appellant
Versus
ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. – Respondent
Mr. Justice V.K. Agrawal, President—By this appeal under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, the order dated 9.3.2005 in Complaint No. 272/2004 by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Durg (hereinafter called the ‘District Forum’ for short) dismissing the complaint, on the ground that the respondent/insurer has already paid to the complainant/appellant a sum of Rs. 3,73,500, towards settlement of his claim has been put under challenge.
2. The relevant facts necessary for the disposal of this appeal stated briefly are that, the complainant’s vehicle C.G.-07-C-1224, comprehensively insured for an assured sum of Rs. 8 lac with the respondent/insurer for the period from 20.3.2004 to 19.3.2005, met with an accident on 11.5.2004 on Bhopal-Hoshangabad Road, resulting in substantial damage to the insured vehicle. Intimation of the accident was given to the respondent/insurer by the complainant. The respondent/insurer appointed Surveyor, K.K. Sharma. He assessed the damage on total loss basis, less salvage value to the extent of Rs. 4,98,000. However, the complainant has been paid Rs. 3,73,500, as per respondents/insurer’s letter dated 2.9.2004 and the complainan
1. III (2002) CPJ 179 (NC)=2003 NCJ 219 (NC). (Referred)
2. III (2002) CPJ 205 (NC)=2003 (1) CPR 72 (NC). (Referred)
3. I (2003) CPJ 55=2003 (1) CPR 371. (Referred)
4. I (2003) CPJ 548=2003 (1) CPR 617. (Referred)
5. I (2001) CPJ 158=2001 (1) CPR 124. (Referred)
6. I (2002) CPJ 158=2002 (1) CPR 342. (Referred)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.