SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

J.D.KAPOOR, RUMNITA MITTAL
MAYUR SEEDS CORPORATION – Appellant
Versus
KRISHNA KUMAR – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellant : None.
For the Respondent: In person.

ORDER

Mr. Justice J.D. Kapoor, President—Respondent is an agriculturist. The appellant is a limited company and is engaged in processing, production and distribution of onion seeds to the ryots on payment for yielding the crops through its agent and distributors all over the country. Respondent No. 2 is authorised distributor of the appellant.

2. Appellant purchased 10 kg. seeds of white onion from the appellant @ Rs. 260 per kg. After sowing his seeds, crops of oinion did not fructify. On account of having sold poor quality seeds the appellant has been vide impugned order dated 20.6.2000 passed by the District Forum, directed to refund Rs. 26,000, towards the cost of the seeds. Rs. 5,000 per acre as damages and Rs. 5,000 as compensation for mental agony and harassment suffered by the respondent.

3. Feeling aggrieved by this order the appellant has directed this appeal.

4. The impugned order has been assailed on multifarious grounds firstly that the District Forum has no territorial jurisdiction; secondly that the respondent was not a consumer as defined under Section 2(1)(d) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 and thirdly that the District Forum has arrived at the conclusion on the












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top