SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

A.RAMAN, R.VANAROJA
S. PITCHAI KANI – Appellant
Versus
A. PRAHALATHAN – Respondent


ORDER

Thiru Justice A. Raman, President—The complainant is the appellant. The complainant laid a claim before the lower Forum pleading as follows:

The complainant purchased shop No. G09 an undivided share of 75 sq. ft. from the opposite party. The complainant paid the full consideration amount of Rs. 1,70,000/-. He has also paid Rs. 5,000/- as additional amount towards single phase power connection. There is no amount due in respect of the transaction from the complainant to the opposite party. The complainant made several requests upon the opposite party to execute the sale deed in his name but the opposite party has been avoiding to do so. To the letter sent by the complainant on 20.11.2000, the opposite party failed to give any reply. The complainant has, therefore, come forward with this complaint for a direction to the opposite party to register the sale deed and pay a sum of Rs. 10,000/- to the complainant for causing mental pain and cost.

2. The opposite party contended as follows:

The complainant is not maintainable. After entering into the agreement, the complainant requested the opposite party to construct a separate bathroom inside the shop premises and put up two windows on





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top