A.RAMAN, R.VANAROJA
S. PITCHAI KANI – Appellant
Versus
A. PRAHALATHAN – Respondent
Thiru Justice A. Raman, President—The complainant is the appellant. The complainant laid a claim before the lower Forum pleading as follows:
The complainant purchased shop No. G09 an undivided share of 75 sq. ft. from the opposite party. The complainant paid the full consideration amount of Rs. 1,70,000/-. He has also paid Rs. 5,000/- as additional amount towards single phase power connection. There is no amount due in respect of the transaction from the complainant to the opposite party. The complainant made several requests upon the opposite party to execute the sale deed in his name but the opposite party has been avoiding to do so. To the letter sent by the complainant on 20.11.2000, the opposite party failed to give any reply. The complainant has, therefore, come forward with this complaint for a direction to the opposite party to register the sale deed and pay a sum of Rs. 10,000/- to the complainant for causing mental pain and cost.
2. The opposite party contended as follows:
The complainant is not maintainable. After entering into the agreement, the complainant requested the opposite party to construct a separate bathroom inside the shop premises and put up two windows on
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.