SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

V.K.AGRAWAL, VEENA MISRA, R.S.AWASTHI
HINDUSTAN MOTORS – Appellant
Versus
KHETAN GOODS TRANSPORT – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellant :Mr. Vishwajeet Soni, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. R.K. Bhawnani, Advocate.

ORDER

Mr. Justice V.K. Agrawal, President—This appeal under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 is directed against the order dated 8.11.2001 in Complaint No. 206/2001 by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Raipur (hereinafter called District Forum for short), dismissing the appellant’s complaint.

2. The appellant averred that he had handed over motor parts worth Rs. 9,856/- on 22.5.2000 to the respondent, for transportation from Raipur to Bilaspur to be delivered to consignee Ajit Auto Parts. The goods as above, however, were not delivered. Hence the complaint for the recovery of the value of the said articles.

3. The complaint was resisted by the opposite party/respondent. It was averred that the complainant did not pay him any consideration for transportation of the above articles. It was accepted by the respondent on account of cordial relations between the parties. It was averred by the respondent that the articles as above were handed over to the consignee Ajit Auto Parts on 25.5.2000. It was, therefore, prayed that the complaint be dismissed.

4. The learned District Forum upheld the contentions of the respondent/opposite party as above and held that no consid







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top