SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

M.A.A.KHAN, RATAN PRAKASH
JAGRAJ @ JAGRAM RATHI – Appellant
Versus
LIC OF INDIA – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellant :Mr. Jagesh Joshi and Mr. Rajiv Surana, Advocates.
For the Respondent:Mr. Balvendra Singh, Advocate.

ORDER

Mr. Ratan Prakash, Member—This appeal is directed against the order of the learned District Forum, Sirohi dated 24.4.1995 whereby the complaint filed by the appellant has been dismissed.

2. Facts relevant for disposal of this appeal in brief are that a proposal to obtain a policy for life under the endowment plan upto the age of 75 years was submitted by Smt. Saraswati Rathi, wife of the complainant-appellant on 28.3.1994 for an amount of Rs. 1.00 lakh when she was of the age of 64 years. Along with the proposal, the appellant paid an amount of Rs. 12,365/- through cheque as the annual premium for the policy; in respect of which the respondent issued a receipt dated 31.3.1994. Although the respondent received the amount of the premium on account of proposed policy but the policy was not issued. It so happened that the proposer Smt. Rathi died on 28.4.1994 and an intimation about it was furnished to the respondent on 29.4.1994. When the appellant claimed the amount under the proposed policy, the respondent repudiated the claim vide its communication dated 26.5.1994 observing that the proposal has not been accepted by the respondent. Aggrieved the appellant filed the complaint be

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top