SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

A.RAMAN, R.VANAROJA
R. BALAGURU – Appellant
Versus
DAILY THANTHI – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsels for the Parties :
For the Petitioner: In person.
For the Respondents: None.

ORDER

Thiru Justice A. Raman, President—The complainant laid the complaint before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, The Nilgiris stating that certain wrong news were published in the newspaper, Daily Thanthi and if such wrong news are published, it is likely to mislead the public especially when such news were published in leading newspapers as that of the opposite party and, therefore, in publishing such wrong information and news, the opposite party has committed acts of deficiency of service and unfair trade practice and, therefore, they are liable to be proceeded against for compensation.

2. It is needless for this Commission at this juncture to consider the nature, import and contents of the alleged wrong news or mis-information published by the opposite party. The lower Forum returned the complaint stating that the claim would fall within the jurisdiction of the State Commission. Therefore, the complainant has now represented the complaint before this Commission and has requested that the District Forum may be directed to take it on file and dispose it of on merits.

3. The lower Forum has overlooked the definition of ‘Service’ when it made the earlier returns. For





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top