SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES
REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MUMBAI
Hon’ble Mr. Justice M.S. Rane, President &
Dr. R.N. Varhadi, Member
MD. ISAQUE WALLIAHMAD PERAMPALLI—Appellant
versus
DR. P.J. KOTHADIYA & ANR.—Respondents
Appeal No. 528 of 1999 and Complaint No. 213 of 1995—Decided on 25.10.2004

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellant : In Person.
For the Respondents: None.
Advocate Mr. H.G. Misar, Amicus Curiae.

The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for the forum to consider relevant materials and proceed diligently in cases of medical negligence, leading to the decision to remit the matter back for fresh consideration on merits.

Headnote:

Medical Negligence - Appeal against District Forum's Order - The court found that the District Forum had proceeded in a perfunctory manner and had not considered relevant materials, leading to the decision to remit the matter back to the District Forum for fresh consideration on merits.

Fact of the Case:

The appellant, who is the original complainant, filed an appeal against the District Forum's order dismissing the complaint of medical negligence. The court found that the District Forum had not considered relevant materials and proceeded in a perfunctory manner.

Finding of the Court:

The court allowed the appeal, set aside the District Forum's order, and remitted the matter back to the District Forum for fresh consideration on merits. The District Forum was instructed to ensure expeditious disposal of the matter after remand.

Issues: The main issue was the dismissal of the complaint of medical negligence by the District Forum, which led to the appeal. The court also highlighted the failure of the District Forum to consider relevant materials and proceed in a perfunctory manner.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the failure of the District Forum to consider relevant materials and proceed in a perfunctory manner, leading to the decision to remit the matter back to the District Forum for fresh consideration on merits.

Final Decision: The appeal was allowed, the District Forum's order was set aside, and the matter was remitted to the District Forum for fresh consideration on merits. The District Forum was instructed to ensure expeditious disposal of the matter after remand.

ORDER

Mr. Justice M.S. Rane, President—Appeal is placed on our today’s Board for admission/hearing which is filed in the year 1999.

2. Appellant/original complainant is present in person. Therefore we requested Senior Counsel Mr. H.G. Misar to render assistance to this Commission in this matter as Amicus Curiae.

3. Appellant is original complainant and respondent original O.P.

(For brevity sake hereinafter the parties will be referred to with their said status in the complaint).

4. The complainant has filed this appeal against the order dated 18.2.1999 passed by the District Forum dismissing the complaint of the complainant holding the complainant having not established his case of medical negligence in the terms on the part of O.P.

5. We have perused the impugned judgment as also related material and we are of the view that District Forum proceeded in perfunctory manner to dispose of the complaint.

6. We have been shown Certificate dated 12.1.1995 issued by Civil Surgeon, Solapur with regard to the physical handicap suffered by the complainant.

7. That being so it was necessary for the District Forum to consider the relevant materials which were constrained to observe has not been done.

8. In the circumstances, we think it appropriate that this matter to go back to the District Forum for consideration afresh on merits. Hence the order.

ORDER

1. Appeal is allowed and its impugned order dated 18.2.1999 is set aside.

2. Matter is remitted to the District Forum, Solapur for consideration afresh on merits in accordance with the provisions of the Law and the Rules and on giving proper opportunities to the parties thereunder.

3. Appellant shall furnish copy of the order herein to the District Forum, Solapur immediately.

4. District Forum shall intimate date of hearing to the parties.

5. The District Forum shall proceed to dispose of the complaint totally uninfluenced by its earlier findings or any observations of ours in the judgment herein concerning the merits of the matter treating the same as our prima facie views and observations thereof.

6. District Forum to ensure expeditious disposal of the matter after remand.

7. As far as this appeal is concerned, no order as to cost.

8. Office to furnish copies of the order to the parties.

Appeal allowed.




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top