SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

A.RAMAN, R.VANAROJA
SAFIRE LITHO GRAPHICS – Appellant
Versus
S. SUBBIAH – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellants :Mr. M. Ashok Kumar, Advocate.
For the Respondent: In person.

ORDER

Thiru Justice A. Raman, President—The opposite parties are the appellants. The complainant is the respondent. The complainant placed an order with the opposite party for the printing and supply of posters.

2. The complainant’s case is thus : He placed an order and sent a sum of Rs. 3,720/- requesting the opposite parties to print posters for the films which were intended to be exhibited. But the opposite parties failed to fulfil his obligation and supplied only posters to the tune of Rs. 270/- and informed the complainant that there was a balance of Rs. 1,700/- and, therefore, there is deficiency in service and hence the opposite parties are liable to make good the loss sustained by the complainant on account of the deficiency in service committed by the opposite parties.

3. In the letter dated 27.11.1999, which has been marked as Ex. B2, the opposite parties have stated that they had supplied posters to the value of Rs. 2,000/- through Azhagarsamy Lorry Transports and a sum of Rs. 2,700/- is already due from the complainant and deducting a sum of Rs. 1,450/-, still there will be a sum of Rs. 1,250/- due to the opposite parties and they have required the complainant to pay the s




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top