SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

D.KARFORMA, S.MAJUMDAR
MANORANJAN SARKAR – Appellant
Versus
WBSEB – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellant :Mr. Ibrahim Shaikh, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Srijan Nayek, Advocate.

ORDER

Mrs. S. Majumder, Member—This appeal has arisen out of the judgment passed by the District Forum, Nadia, on 17.1.2002 in the Case No. 26/2001, wherein the Forum has dismissed the case on contest without any cost and directed that the O.P.-WBSEB is at liberty to realize the dues in respect of the Industrial meter connection either by way of defence in the title suit pending between Mr. D. Sarkar and the WBSEB or by filing a separate money suit against the defaulting subscriber and the O.P. was directed to refund the quotational money received from the complainant along with admissible interest within one month from the date of the order.

2. The facts of the case of the complainant in a nutshell are stated hereunder.

3. Being a permanent resident the complainant applied for domestic electric connection to the O.P.-WBSEB on 3.12.1998 and complied with all necessary formalities regarding getting new connection as required and as per direction of the O.P.-WBSEB. After inspection the O.P. had sent quotation on 3.12.1998, requiring him to make deposits of the requisite amount and accordingly on 7.4.1999 the complainant deposited the amount in connection with the service connection No.








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top