SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

R.VANAROJA, GUNASEKARAN, A.RAMAN
A. KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
HINDU MISSION HOSPITAL – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellant :Mr. T.S. Kannan, Advocate.
For the Respondent:M/s. Sarvabhauman & Associates, Advocates.

ORDER

Thiru Justice A. Raman, President—The complainant was working as a helper. In the course of his employment, he was involved in an accident where an iron rotation motor fell on his right leg below the knee resulting in fracture of the same. The complainant was taken to the Hindu Mission Hospital at Tambaram. The complainant’s case is that at that time, the staff nurse intersed the needles in the artery while administering I.V. fluid in the right wrist portion and as a result of which the blood started gushing up the tube and this is clearly negligence and inefficiency and on account of the same, the complainant’s two fingers and right index finger became necrotic and gangrene set in as a result of which they had to be removed. Therefore, claiming compensation the complaint had been laid.

2. The Lower Forum dismissed the complaint and aggrieved by the same, the present appeal is preferred by the complainant.

3. The complainant has stated in the complaint as follows: The staff nurse inserted the needles, probably not in the veins but in the arteries at the right wrist portion, as a result of which, instead of glucose dripping from the tube, blood started gushing up the tube. Theref










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top