SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

PUNJAB STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES
REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHANDIGARH
Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.S. Mongia, President &
Mr. C.P. Budhiraja, Member
MADAN LAL CHAWLA & ANR.—Complainants
versus
CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA & ORS.—Respondents
First Appeal No. 1400 of 2000—Decided on 31.10.2005

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Complainants :Mr. P.K.S. Gill, Advocate.
For the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2:Mr. Ashok Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondent No. 3: None.

Headnote:Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 12 and 17 - Bank locker service - Deficiency - Complainant operated bank locker on 22-10-1994 - Bank official, custodian of locker, informed complainant on 16-1-1995 that locker was lying unlocked - Complainant found entire gold jewellery missing from locker - Complaint for compensation alleging deficiency on part of bank dismissed by Dist. Forum - Appeal - Instructions issued by Bank for taking necessary precautions in matter of Safe Deposit Lockers - Contention that bank failed to follow the instruction i.e. Custodian of locker to inspect locker immediately after operation by complainant - National Commission in R.G. Srivastava case found that question whether locker was left open by complainant or was broken open by someone else later required examination of detailed evidence and value of jewellery kept therein could satisfactorily be determined in Civil Suit - Facts of case were covered by R.G. Srivastavas decision - Locker looked locked as if it had been properly locked after its operation was admitted by complainant - No evidence whether actually gold had been kept in locker - All such questions could be determined in civil suit on examination of evidence in detail - Bank instructions relied upon by complainant were of year 1995 whereas incident was of 1994.(Paras 8 to 12)

       Result : Appeal dismissed with liberty to complainant to approach civil court.

       Cases referred :

       IMPORTANT POINT

       Question whether Safe Deposit locker in bank was properly locked by complainant hirer after operation or it was broken open subsequently by some one needs

       detailed examination of evidence and

       could not be determined in consumer complaint.

ORDER

Mr. Justice R.S. Mongia, President—This is an appeal by the complainants whose complaint had been dismissed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Patiala vide order dated 16.11.2000.

2. The brief facts giving rise to this appeal may be noticed:

Complainants Madan Lal Chawla and his wife Smt. Asha Chawla had hired Locker No. 81 from the opposite party Central Bank of India, Branch Repture Township. The locker was last operated by complainant No. 2 Asha Chawla on 22.10.1994 (Karwa Chauth Day). On 16.1.1995 at about 4-30 p.m., Shri Tilak Raj Barara, Custodian of Lockers, Central Bank of India, Branch Rajpura Township, accompanied by one Shri N.K. Sharma, came to the business premises of complainant No. 1 Madan Lal Sharma to inform that their locker was lying unlocked. Complainant No. 2, on the asking of her husband, rushed to the Bank. On checking of the locker, she found to her surprise that the entire gold jewellery was missing from the locker. She informed her husband on telephone and he also reached the Bank. Complainant No. 1 lodged the report with the Police vide DDR No. 2 the same day. The complainants also made representation to the higher authorities of the Bank but no action was taken. Complaint was filed before the District Forum alleging that the gold jewellery, which was missing from the locker, valued Rs. 2.25 lakh. The list of the gold ornaments allegedly kept in the locker is Ex. C-5. The following articles are mentioned in list Ex. C-5:

(1)

Ladies set (necklace 1 and one pair of Kante):

75 Gms.


(2)

Ladies set (1 necklace, a pair of kante and one ring :

60 gms.


(3)

One ladies chain :

30 gms.


(4)

One ladies chain :

20 gms.


(5)

One gents chain :

20 gms


(6)

Ladies bangles (6) :

90 gms


(7)

Ladies bangles (2) :

20 gms


(8)

Gents ring (1) :

10 gms


(9)

Gents ring (1) :

7 gms


(10

One set of ladies rings :

10 gm


(11)

One set of ladies rings :

7 gms


(12)

One set of ladies rings :

9 gms


(13)

One pair of ear-tops (Larri Wale) :

12 gms


(14)

One pair of ladies small ear-tops :

6 gms


(15)

One pair of ladies small Kante :

6 gms


(16)

One ladies Mangal Sutra :

30 gms


(17)

One pair of ladies Kante (3-storeyed) :

15 gms


(18)

One pair of ladies Kante :

10 gms


(19)

One pair of ladies Kante :

10 gms.


It was the allegation of the complainants that the Bank oficials were negligent and had not complied with the instructions and, therefore, there was deficiency in service. Therefore, the Bank was liable to reimburse the loss as also pay compensation for unnecessary harassment. Evidence was led by both the parties before the District Forum and, after appreciating the evidence as also the arguments, the District Forum dismissed the complaint. Hence the present appeal.

3. Relevant portion of the instructions dated 7.6.1995 issued by the Central Bank of India for taking necessary precautions in the matter of Safe Deposit Lockers are:

“(1) The relationship of the Bank and the locker holder is essentially that of a lessor and a lessee and among other things, the Bank as the lessor is duty-bound to ensure safety of the locker, i.e., the same is properly closed after each operation since the Bank is the custodian of the locker.

(2) xx xx xx xx

(3) xx xx xx xx

(4) The mechanism is such that locker must get closed if the locker holder closes the door and takes out his/her key.

(5) A certificate is recorded by the custodian of the Bank that all the lockers operated during a day have been checked and found properly locked. Onus of ensuring that all the lockers used during the day are properly locked lies with the custodian of the locker. Any negligence will prove costly to the Bank/custodian.

(6) The branches are advised to inspect the locker immediately after it has been operated by the locker holder with a view to ensure that locker operated is properly locked.”

4. It is also mentioned in these very instructions as follows:

“Central Office through the above referred circular has already advised all the branches to inspect the locker immediately after the locker has been operated by the locker holder a


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top