R.C.KATHURIA, SHAKUNTLA YADAV, BANARSI DAS
HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Appellant
Versus
SATISH CHANDER GUJRAL – Respondent
Mr. Justice R.C. Kathuria, President—This order shall dispose of both the above mentioned appeals as they have arisen out of the common order dated 16.3.2006 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Panchkula whereby both the above mentioned complaints were due titled after they were consolidated by the District Forum and tried together.
2. For adjudication of the controversy involved in these appeals firstly the facts of the Complaint Case No. 271 of 2005 titled as ‘Satish Chander Gujral v. HUDA’ have to be noticed. The facts of this case are that plot bearing No. 497 measuring 250 sq. yards located in Sector 7, Urban Estate, Ambala City was allotted to Shri Vijay Kumar as per memo No. EO (A) -79/2346 dated 13.5.1980 for a tentative price of Rs. 13,585. Thereafter, the said plot was tranferred to the complainant vide memo No. 398 dated 24.4.1981 on the terms and conditions mentioned in the original letter of allotment. The complainant paid the entire price of the plot to the original allottee before transfer was accepted in his name. The complainant appraoched the opposite party No. 2 for obtaining ‘No Due Certificate’ and in reply he was informed vide memo No
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.