SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

J.D.KAPOOR, RUMNITA MITTAL
MANOHAR LAL SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
URBAN IMPROVEMENT COMPANY (P) LTD. – Respondent


ORDER

Mr. Justice J.D. Kapoor, President—Complainant was 50 years old when he booked two plots, one in his name and another in his wife’s name with the opposite party Urban Improvement Co. (P) Ltd. in Greenfield Society. Having waited for 45 years and having paid the entire consideration amount, he could not get the possession as the plots were cancelled in the year 2002 allegedly on non-payment of the amounts demanded from time to time on account of additional development charges. He is now 95 years old and has on account of wrongful cancellation of the plots, through this complaint, sought following reliefs:

A. Direct the respondent to immediately handover the peaceful possession to the complainant of the said plot No. N-94, measuring 223 sq. yds. booked in the name of the complainant and that of the said Plot No. N-135 measuring 267 sq. yds. booked in the name of late Smt. Mohan Devi Sharma the wife of the complainant or in the alternative direct inter alia to the respondent to pay a sum of Rs. 10,000 per sq. yards i.e. Rs. 22,30,000 for the said plot No. N-94 and Rs. 26,70,000 on the said plot No. N-135, to the complainant for non-delivery of the possession of the said plot and
























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top