Mr. Justice M.B. Shah, President—Being aggrieved and dissatisfied by the Judgment and Order dated 13.12.2005 passed in Appeal No. 155 of 2005 by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Union Territory, Chandigarh, petitioner - M/s. Reliance India Mobile Ltd., has preferred this Revision Petition.

2. The State Commission confirmed the order dated 29.7.2005 passed by the District Forum-II, Chandigarh, in Consumer Complaint No. 1057 of 2004, and imposed Rs. 50,000 as punitive damages with costs quantified at Rs. 5,000. Further, the District Forum vide its order dated 29.7.2005 passed in Complaint No. 1057 of 2004, directed the petitioner to shift the mobile telephone of the complainant from Chandigarh to Kurukshetra region and to pay a sum of Rs. 10,000 as compensation for deficiency in service and costs of Rs. 2,500. In default, the petitioner was also to pay interest at the rate of 6% p.a. on the awarded amount.

3. Against the order of the State Commission, the petitioner has filed this revision petition before this Commission. However, the State Commission further ordered for initiation of criminal proceedings against the petitioner, particularly, its authorised signat