Urban Improvement Trust – Appellant
Versus
S. A. Bindal Engineer & Contractor – Respondent
Navin Chandra Sharma, President - Initially Urban Improvement Trust, Ajmer had filed Appeal No: 336/94 against the order of the pistrict Form, Ajmer dt: 18-1-94 passed on application under S. 27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 moved by the complainant before that Forum, but later on upon the request of the counsel for the Trust made on 14.7.94, Appeal No: 336/94 was treated as revision and registered as Revision No: 64/94. Argument of the learned counsels for the parties were heard. It is clear that Complaint Case No: 587/90 filed by the complainant-respondent, the District Forum by its order dt: 22.10.90 had passed an order under S. 14 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 directing the Urban Improvement Trust to refund the amounts of Rs. 87,583/- and Rs. 10,000/- to the complainant within two months of the date of the order. It was further mentioned in the order that the complainant will be entitled to interest on the said amount at 12% p.a. The Urban Improvement Trust, Ajmer did not file any appeal against the order of the District Forum, Ajmer dtd. 22.10.90, and consequently that order has attained finality. The present revision petition has been filed by the Urban Imp
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.