SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

Urban Improvement Trust – Appellant
Versus
S. A. Bindal Engineer & Contractor – Respondent


ORDER

Navin Chandra Sharma, President - Initially Urban Improvement Trust, Ajmer had filed Appeal No: 336/94 against the order of the pistrict Form, Ajmer dt: 18-1-94 passed on application under S. 27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 moved by the complainant before that Forum, but later on upon the request of the counsel for the Trust made on 14.7.94, Appeal No: 336/94 was treated as revision and registered as Revision No: 64/94. Argument of the learned counsels for the parties were heard. It is clear that Complaint Case No: 587/90 filed by the complainant-respondent, the District Forum by its order dt: 22.10.90 had passed an order under S. 14 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 directing the Urban Improvement Trust to refund the amounts of Rs. 87,583/- and Rs. 10,000/- to the complainant within two months of the date of the order. It was further mentioned in the order that the complainant will be entitled to interest on the said amount at 12% p.a. The Urban Improvement Trust, Ajmer did not file any appeal against the order of the District Forum, Ajmer dtd. 22.10.90, and consequently that order has attained finality. The present revision petition has been filed by the Urban Imp






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top