SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

Satheesh Nambisan, Sentoza Cable TV. Set – Appellant
Versus
Jose Philip – Respondent


ORDER

P.K. Shamsuddin, President- This Revision Petition is filed against the order passed by the District Forum, Alappuzha, in E.P. No. 122/94 in O.P. 455/93.

2. An order was passed by the District Forum directing the opposite party to refund Rs.81,500/- together with interest at 18% per annum from 7-4-1992 to the complainant within one month from the date of the order. The opposite party did not comply with the order and an Execution Petition was filed. An objection was filed by the opposite party stating that he had no means to pay the amount. The complainant filed an affidavit stating that the opposite party has got sufficient means to pay the amount and the non-compliance of the order is wilful1 and deliberate.

3. The District Forum acting upon the affidavit filed by the complainant stating that the opposite party has means passed an order stating that the non-compliance is wilfull are deliberate to avoid payment and ordered to issue a warrant for the arrest of the judgment debtor. In the revision the order was challenged.

4. In this revision petition learned counsel appearing for the appellant submitted that the order under attack is unsustainable and that the order has to be tre

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top