Reprographics Division HCL Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Sanjay Kumar Sharma – Respondent
P.N. Nag, President-This appeal is directed against the order of the District Forum, whereby the District Forum has directed the appellants-M/S Reprographics Division HCL Ltd. to replace the photocopier by doing installation of a new photocopier at their own risk and cost in the premises of the complainant, failing which, the complainant shall be entitled to get the refund of Rs. 1,05,000/- the price paid by the complainant to the appellants for the purchase of photostat machine alongwith interest @ 18% per annum from the date of filing the complaint i.e. 9-10-1993 and a compensation of Rs. 44,300/- alongwith the cost of Rs. 2,000/-.
2. The brief relevant facts need to be stated are that respondent/complainant Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma(hereinafter to be referred to as the complainant purchased photostat machine from the appellants/ opposite parties(hereinafter to be referred to as the opposite parties) which was installed at the premises of the complainant M/S Sanjay General Store. Dalhousie. The warranty period of this machine was 3 months which expired on 1-9-1993. According to the complainant ever since the installation of this machine at his shop at Dalhousie, it never functi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.