SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

C. Narasimha Rao – Appellant
Versus
K. R. Neelakandan & Anr. – Respondent


ORDER

B.S. Yadav, Member - This is an appeal against the order of State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission. Tamil Nadu at Madras dated 15th May, 1992 passed in O.P. No. 21 of 1992. The said Original Petition, i.e., the complaint was filed by the present respondents against appellant herein. By the impugned order, the State Commission ordered the appellant to pay Rs.76,000/- with interest at the rate of 2%. Feeling aggrieved, the opposite party in the complaint, i.e., the present appellant has come before this Commission in appeal.

2. The facts are that the complainants, who are brothers, are the owners of a piece of land situated at Madras. There was a small tiled house in the said land. The complainants entered into an agreement with the opposite party for the construction of two flats in the ground floor for the complainants. The flats to be constructed on the first floor when to be taken by the opposite party or his nominee. The complainants had to execute a Deed of Salt: in respect of the undivided share in the land in favour of the opposite party or his nominee. The construction was to be completed within one year from the date of demolition of the old building on the site.






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top