SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

K.S.GUPTA, P.D.SHENOY
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Raj Kumar Chuchra – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Neeraj Singh, Advocate.

ORDER

K. S. Gupta, Member—Challenge in this revision is to the order dated 20.2.07 of Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT, Chandigarh dismissing appeal against the order dated 15.9.06 of a District Forum whereby petitioner insurance company was directed to pay a total amount of Rs.2,02,500 on account of mediclaim etc. to the respondent.

2. Respondent/Complainant and his wife Mrs. Lalita Chuchra had taken mediclaim policy for Rs.1,50,000 each from 9.3.2002 to 8.3.2003 from the petitioner/opposite party. Prior to this they had taken mediclaim policy twice but no amount was claimed thereunder. Respondent developed heart problem and ultimately he underwent CABG in 10.2.03. Though he had incurred expenses of Rs.2,35,000 on treatment but amount of Rs.1,50,000 being amount of policy, only was claimed. On that claim being repudiated through the letter dated 30.1.04 by the petitioner on ground of respondent suffering from long standing diabetes mellitus which he did not disclose at the time of purchase of policy, he filed complaint which on contest on similar ground, was allowed by the District Forum and appeal against District Forum’s order filed by the petitioner was dismissed by the




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top