R.S. Mongia, President—This order of ours will dispose of six consumer complaints i.e. Consumer Complaint Nos. 11, 12, 14 & 15 of 2006 and 5 & 6 of 2007 as identical questions of law and facts are involved in all these complaints. Consumer Complaint Nos. 5 & 6 of 2007 were fixed for hearing on 29th of May 2007. Since almost identical facts are involved in these complaints with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties the same were proponed for hearing on 16.5.2007 when Consumer Complaints No. 11 & 12 of 2006 were heard. Though no written statement has been filed by the respondents in these complaints but as the primary facts are no different and only law point is involved, therefore, it is not necessary to have written statement in these cases. Consumer Complaints No. 14 & 15 of 2006 were heard on 18.5.2007. For sake of convenience, facts are being taken from Consumer Complaint No. 11 of 2006.

2. This complaint has been filed by complainant Shri Nachhattar Singh son of Shri Sadha Singh alleging following facts:

State of Punjab had acquired land of various people somewhere in the year 1964 under the Town Improvement Trust Act for development of a scheme known as “Teac