SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

S.N.KAPOOR, B.K.TAIMNI
Rasik Lal Babu Lal Patadia – Appellant
Versus
Arya Bhattacharjee – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. Mayur R. Shah, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Mr. Deepak Jena, Advocate.

ORDER

B.K. Taimni, Member— Appellant Rasik Lal Babu Lal Patadia was the opposite party No. 2 before the State Commission in a complaint filed by the Complainant Arya Bhattacharjee, the sole Proprietor of Raja & Co., a proprietary firm.

2. Very briefly the facts leading to the filing of the complaint were that the second respondent, Sharda Drugs & Industries Ltd., had appointed the Complainant Arya Bhattacharjee, the distributor of the company on certain terms and conditions. It was the case of the complainant that the respondent company suddenly withdrew work orders and intimated the complainant that they were suspending their marketing operation in West Bengal. It was the case of the first complainant that he had created a huge establishment for his distribution work, and unilaterally terminating the agreement was a case of deficiency in service on the part of the second respondent Sharda Drugs and Industries Ltd. It is in these circumstances that a complaint was filed before the State Commission where an ex parte order was passed against the opposite parties, i.e., the Appellant and Second Respondent, directing them to pay, in all, Rs. 7,56,918 alongwith interest @ 18 % w.e.f. 1.

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top