SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

S.N.KAPOOR, B.K.TAIMNI
R. S. Rama Chandra Murty – Appellant
Versus
K. Virender Reddy – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellants: R.S. Rama Chandra Murthy: In Person.

ORDER

S. N. Kapoor, Presiding Member—This is complainant’s appeal against the order passed by the Andhra Pradesh Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission directing the opposite party respondent to allot Flat No. C206 in favour of the complainant by collecting registration charges from the complainant appellant by taking the price @ Rs. 675 per sq. ft. and adjust the amount of Rs. 9,70,000 towards the cost of the said plot and refund the balance amount within a period of six weeks from the date of order i.e. 31st March, 2007 @ 9% p.a. from the date of last payment made by the complainant till the date of payment. The opposite party was also directed to pay Rs. 50,000 towards compensation for delay in possession to the complainant together with a sum of Rs. 5,000 towards costs.

2. The grievance of the appellant is that he had paid in all Rs. 16,32,150

3. The appellant has sought the following relief’s:

1. confirming my total payment to be Rs. 16,32,150 as on 25.1.2003 towards the booking of two flats, flat price at Rs. 675 sq ft for the specifications stated in all my correspondence and in the C.D.

2. directing the respondent/opposite parties to furnish the available list with char












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top