SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

J.D.KAPOOR, MAHESH CHANDRA
Indian Airlines – Appellant
Versus
Renu Gupta – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the parties :
For the Appellant :Mr. Asad Alvi, Advocate.
For the Respondents: None.

ORDER

J.D. Kapoor, President — By this common order we shall be disposing of the above mentioned four appeals arising from the order dated 29.9.2005 passed by the District Forum.

2. Appellant airlines sells tickets to its consumer through its agents. On account of having failed to inform the respondent who had booked four tickets from the appellant airlines flight No. IC 7133 for travel on 21.9.2002 from Indore to Delhi about the change of time as the scheduled departure was originally 11 .05 hours but it departed at 19.40 hours, the appellant has been vide impugned order dated 29.9.2005 directed to pay Rs. 5000 each of the respondents as compensation and Rs. 1,000 as cost of litigation, total Rs. 24,000.

3. There is no dispute that respondent No.3 BPL Travel Pvt. Ltd. was operating its agent for booking the tickets. However, the tickets were purchased from sub-agent of respondent No. 3 namely Lords Travel i.e., respondent No. 2. The perusal of the record shows that everybody is shifting the blame to each other. The appellant has taken the plea that it had duly informed its agent i.e. respondent No. 3 one week prior the change in the schedule. So much so that the appellant could not d












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top