SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

K.S.GUPTA, B.K.TAIMNI
Agsun Seeds (India) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
N. Nagendra Reddy – Respondent


Counsel for the parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Azim, Mr. H. Laskar & Mr. V.S. Reddy, Advocates.
For the Respondents:Ms. T. Anamika, Advocate.

ORDER

B.K. Tamini, Member — Petitioner was the opposite party before the District Forum, where the complainant had filed a complaint alleging deficiency in service on the part of the petitioner.

2. Very briefly the facts of the case are that the 12th Respondent purchased sun-flower seed from the Petitioner and he allegedly got them transported and then distributed the seed to respondent 1 to 11. The crop allegedly failed and

thus, alleging deficiency in service

filed a complaint before the District Forum, who after hearing the parties directed the petitioner granting following reliefs:—

"23. In the result, the petition is allowed with costs of Rs. 500/- directing the respondent No. 1 to 3 to pay a sum of Rs. 1,46,700/- with interest @ 12% p.a. from the date of petition, i.e. 20.12.1996, till the date of realization, and also pay a sum of Rs. 12,000/- to the petitioners @ Rs. 1000/- each to the petitioner towards mental agony and also pay a sum of Rs. 42,850/- which is the cost of the seeds, within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order."

3. On an appeal being filed by the petitioner before the State Commission, this was dismissed by the State Commi-ssion, hence thi





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top