SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

B.K.TAIMNI
Oriental Bank of Commerce – Appellant
Versus
Moti Lal Sharma – Respondent


Counsel for the parties :
For the Appellant :Mr. H.C. Kundra and Mr. D.K. Mishra, Advocates.
For the Respondent:Mr. Sunil Aggarwal, Advocate.

ORDER

B.K. Taimni, Member — These two appeals arise from a common order passed by the State Commission on 9.5.1997.

2. Very briefly the facts of the case are that the complainant Mr. Moti Lal Sharma (since deceased) obtained a Jeevan Dhara Policy from Life Insurance Corporation of India (L.I.C.) in his own name in the year 1989. Upon surrender of the policy on 14-8-1992, as per rules, alongwith the prescribed form and completing all the formalities, when the complainant/respondent was not getting the money, he made several visits to the office of L.I.C., he was not being attended to but finally in reply to letter of the appellants, L.I.C. wrote to the complainant that the surrender value of the Policy amounting to Rs. 1,36,548/- has been sent to the complainant by their cheque No. 989887 dated 8-9-1992, drawn on the United Commercial Bank, New Delhi under registered cover on 25-9-1992. Since the complainant had never received this amount, again the matter was taken up with the appellant, L.I.C., but getting no reply, the complainant filed a complaint before the State Commission, who after hearing the parties and also joining Oriental Bank of Commerce as a party, allowed the complain
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top