K.C. Gupta, President — This appeal has been directed by complainant against order dated 10-8-2005 passed by Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-II, U.T. Chandigarh (hereinafter to be referred as District Consumer Forum), whereby his complaint was dismissed being devoid of any merit. However, parties were left to bear their own costs.

2. Briefly stated the facts are that the appellant is an advocate by profession. He has been practising at different Courts at Chandigarh including High Court. Respondents have been dealing in the business of electronic publishing, storing and selling electronic law library since 1993. They had upgraded their product/services under the brand name of “GRAND JURIX” since the year 2000. The said product was being marketed in almost all parts of India. According to them, their product had acquired a substantial goodwill and reputation on the basis of quality of product. The appellant was attracted to the scheme of respondents known as Grand Jurix-2001. According to the scheme, they supplied 16 CDs to him i.e. 4 CDs after every three months for one whole year till December, 2001. According to respondents, CDs were containing full judgments up to Hon’b