SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

K.S.GUPTA, B.K.TAIMNI
Agsun Seeds (India) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
N. Nagendra Reddy – Respondent


Counsel for the parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Azim, Mr. H. Laskar & Mr. V.S. Reddy, Advocates.
For the Respondents:Ms. T. Anamika, Advocate.

ORDER

B.K. Tamini, Member - Petitioner was the opposite party before the District Forum, where the complainant had filed a complaint alleging deficiency in service on the pan of the petitioner.

2. Very briefly the facts of the case are that the 12th Respondent purchased sun-flower seed from the Petitioner and he allegedly got them transported and then distributed the seed to respondent 1 to 11. The crop allegedly failed and thus', alleging deficiency in service filed a complaint before the District Forum, who after hearing the parties directed the petitioner granting following relief’s:-

“23. In the result, the petition is allowed with costs of Rs. 500/- directing the respondent No. 1 to 3 to pay a sum of Rs. 1,46,700/- with interest @ 12% p.a. from the date of petition, i.e. 20.12.1996, till the date of realization, and also pay a sum of Rs. 12,000/- to the petitioners @ Rs. 1000/- each to the petitioner towards mental agony and also pay a sum of Rs. 42,850/- which is the ,cost of the seeds, within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.”

3. On an appeal being filed by the petitioner before the State Commission, this was dismissed by the State Commission, hence thi





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top