B.B.VAGYANI, P.N.KASHALKAR, S.P.LALE
Shalan Shrirang Jadhav – Appellant
Versus
Prakash Choukwale – Respondent
P.N. Kashalkar, Judicial Member—Feeling aggrieved by the judgment and order of dismissal passed by District Consumer Forum, Satara in consumer complaint No. 03/06 decided on 29.6.2006, the org. complainant has filed this appeal challenging dismissal of her complaint.
2. There is delay of 30 days in filing the appeal. Therefore; appellant has made an application for condonation of delay. It is stated in Para 5 of the delay condonation application that her financial condition was too much bad and she was not aware about the further procedure of law. We are not satisfied by the explanation resorted to. Just and sufficient cause has not been made out in the application for condonation of delay. Therefore, we are not inclined to condone the delay.
3. Briefly case of the appellant/org. complainant is as under:
Complainant is a widow having a disabled son and minor daughter. Her husband was serving at Mumbai. In the year July, 2002, he met with an accident and he was admitted in the Sancheti Hospital at Pune. There he was operated. He was having blood sugar and by taking medicine he had controlled sugar level in the blood. Therefore, complainant and her husband shifted to Satara. On 6
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.