SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

B.K.TAIMNI, S.N.KAPOOR
Vishnu Tex – Appellant
Versus
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Complainant:Dr. Ramesh K. Haritash and Mr. Sanjay K. Hadala, Advocates.
For the Opp. Parties:Mr. Atul Nanda, Advocate.

ORDER

Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

2. In this matter, in an unfortunate incident fire took place on 14.10.2002 and the complainant, who was running a factory of readymade garments and carpets, suffered a loss of Rs.1,81,23,405. The complainant intimated about the incident to the insurance company and the insurance company appointed surveyor. Mr. Avinash Sharma, Surveyor and Loss Assessor gave his final survey report on 29.4.2003 assessing the loss at Rs.1,23,03,280. In terms of the surveyor’s report, a sum of Rs.1,22,93,970 was paid to the complainant on 16.10.2003. It is contended that the complainant signed a receipt for full and final settlement of the claim under pressure and financial constraints, though a sum of Rs.57,86,030 remained unpaid. On 15.3.2004, the remaining amount was demanded and thereafter a Legal Notice was also sent in the month of April 2004, alleging as under:

* That your surveyor Mr. Avinash Sharma is a dishonest person who was arrested red handed to taking the bribe in Patiala on January 2004 which was published in Newspaper and your surveyor also asked my client to oblige him, if not, he will reduce the claim up to the minimum limits.

* Th


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top