R.C. Jain, Member—The challenge in this revision is to the order dated 7.1.2004 passed by State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Jharkhand Ranchi (for short the ‘State Commission’) in appeal No.402/2003. Vide the impugned order the State Commission has dismissed the appeal filed by the petitioner herein against the order dated 18.7.2003 passed by the District Consumer Forum, Deogarh in complaint case No.90/02.

2. The consumer dispute in this case relate to the manufacturing defects in the Kinetic Boss motorcycle purchased by the respondent Deepak Kumar Singh from the petitioner dealer on 22.7.02 against payment of Rs.33,700. Immediately after the purchase of the said motorcycle, the respondent noticed certain defects including the manufacturing defects in the motorcycle which could not be rectified by the petitioner despite their efforts to do so. The respondent, therefore, filed complaint against the petitioner dealer and the manufacturer seeking replacement of the motorcycle with a new motorcycle or in the alternative for a direction on the dealer and the manufacturer to refund the price of the motorcycle along with interest besides compensation. Before the District Fo