SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

P.D.SHENOY, R.C.JAIN
Hotel Hyatt Regency – Appellant
Versus
Atul Virmani – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Shri Ravi Gopal, Advocate.

ORDER

P.D. Shenoy, Member—The issue involved in this case is if the keys of the car given by the customer of a Five Star Hotel for parking to the uniformed valet of the hotel is stolen whether the Five Star Hotel is responsible for making good the loss to the consumer.

Facts of the case in brief are as follows:

2. Mr. Atul Virmani came to Delhi by his Maruti Gypsy, which he had purchased from M/s Rohan Motors, Dehradun for Rs. 2,86,395. It is the say of the complainant that accessories worth Rs. 50,000/- were installed in the said vehicle which was insured against third party claim but the peril of theft was not included in the policy.

3. The case of the complainant is that on 18.9.1996 at about 11.15 p.m. he visited the Hyatt Regency (the Hotel) by paying a fee of Rs. 900/-. According to the complainant this fee included the entrance fee as well as for the safe parking of the vehicle. On arrival at the hotel the representative of the hotel demanded the key of the vehicle for parking the vehicle at the parking lot in safe custody. Therefore, the complainant delivered the possession of the vehicle to the representative of the hotel who drove the car to the parking lot. The valet had iss




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top