SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

ARIJIT PASAYAT, S.H.KAPADIA
National Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Laxmi Narain Dhut – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellant :Joy Basu, B.K. Satija, Vishnu Mehra, Kishore Rawat, M.K. Dua, K.L. Nandwani, Debasis Misra, S.K. Ray, Jai Prakash Pandey and Ashok Kumar Sharma, Advocates.
For the Respondent:A.K. Chitale, Sr. Advocate, Imtiaz Ahmed, Mrs. Naghma Imtiaz, Abhishek Anand (for M/s. Equity Lex Associates), Ms. Ginny J. Rautray, Ms. Shobha, Chandramohan A., Ms. Niraj Sharma, Ajay Jha, P.H. Parekh, Nitin Thakral (for M/s. P.H. Parekh & Co.), Ms. Mridulla Ray Bhardwaj, Dr. Krishan Singh Chauhan, Chand Kiran, Ms. Gyan Mitra and P.K. Jayakrishnan, Atul Nanda, Ms. Rameeza Hakeem, Rajesh Kumar and Ms. Charu Singhal, Advocates.

JUDGMENT

Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J.—Leave granted.

2. In all these cases identical questions are involved and therefore the appeals are disposed of by this common judgment.

3. In each of the impugned judgments the concerned High Court held that the principles laid down by this Court in National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Swaran Singh1 is applicable even to claims other than third party claims. Some of these appeals also relate to orders passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi (in short the ‘Commission’) where a similar view has been taken.

4. Since there has been elaborate analysis of the factual position it would be appropriate to decide the basic principles in law and ask the High Courts/Commissions to decide the cases afresh keeping in mind the view expressed in the present judgment.

5. The decision in Swaran Singh’s case (supra) applied to claims which involved only the insurance company and the owner of the vehicle i.e. where there was no third party involved. It has been highlighted by learned counsel for the appellants that Swaran Singh’s case (supra) was rendered in the background of Section 149 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (in short the ‘Act’) whi








































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top