R.C.JAIN, P.D.SHENOY
Prasad Homes Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
E. Mahender Reddy – Respondent
R.C. Jain, Presiding Member—Common order dated 6.12.2007 passed by A.P. Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Hyderabad (for short the ‘State Commission’) in FA No. 1639 of 2007 is sought to be impugned in these revision petitions. By the impugned order the State Commission has dismissed the appeals filed by the petitioner builder against the order passed by the District Forum Nizamabad in complaint case No. 41 of 2006, 43/2006 and 44-2006. The District Forum had allowed the complaint filed by the respondent-complainants and directed the petitioner-builder to repay the amount received by him from the complainants with 9% interest from the date of deposit till realization. The complaints were filed by the respondents with the allegations that they joined and became members in the scheme of OP No. 2 through OP No. 1 at Nizamabad by paying membership fee of Rs. 500 and booked plots by paying Rs. 7,000 towards 1st installment on 29.8.2003 by the complainant No. 1 and was issued pass book No. 618 and complainant No. 2 became a member paying Rs. 500 towards membership fee and booked a plot No. 207 paying Rs. 7,000 on 28.9.2003 and was issued pass book No. 622 located at Kallakal v
1.Homoeopathic Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh v. Miss Gunita Virk
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.