SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

R.C.JAIN, P.D.SHENOY
Prasad Homes Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
E. Mahender Reddy – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Sh. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate.

ORDER

R.C. Jain, Presiding Member—Common order dated 6.12.2007 passed by A.P. Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Hyderabad (for short the ‘State Commission’) in FA No. 1639 of 2007 is sought to be impugned in these revision petitions. By the impugned order the State Commission has dismissed the appeals filed by the petitioner builder against the order passed by the District Forum Nizamabad in complaint case No. 41 of 2006, 43/2006 and 44-2006. The District Forum had allowed the complaint filed by the respondent-complainants and directed the petitioner-builder to repay the amount received by him from the complainants with 9% interest from the date of deposit till realization. The complaints were filed by the respondents with the allegations that they joined and became members in the scheme of OP No. 2 through OP No. 1 at Nizamabad by paying membership fee of Rs. 500 and booked plots by paying Rs. 7,000 towards 1st installment on 29.8.2003 by the complainant No. 1 and was issued pass book No. 618 and complainant No. 2 became a member paying Rs. 500 towards membership fee and booked a plot No. 207 paying Rs. 7,000 on 28.9.2003 and was issued pass book No. 622 located at Kallakal v







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top