SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

K.C.GUPTA, S.P.KAPOOR, DEVINDERJIT DHATT
ICICI Bank Ltd. through its Manager – Appellant
Versus
Gurmandeep Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Sh. Jatin Kumar, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

K.C. Gupta, President— This appeal has been directed by OP against order dated 3.7.2008 passed by Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh (for short hereinafter to be referred as District Consumer Forum) vide which complaint of the respondents was accepted and the appellants were directed to recalculate the loan account of the respondents and work out the correct amount of interest and other charges levied on them from the date of first EMI upto 9.7.2007, the date on which the full and final loan amount was paid and to make the payment of excess/difference amount to the respondents and further to give details of all calculations so made to the respondents and also to pay Rs. 30,000 as compensation for mental as well as physical harassment besides Rs. 2,500 as litigation expenses.

2. Briefly stated the facts are that the respondents (complainants) took loan of Rs. 13,20,000 for 20 years i.e. 240 months from the appellant on 31.3.2006 vide Annexures C1 & C2 for the purchase of House No.707, Sector 11, Ranjit Nagar, Tehsil Kharar, District Mohali. Rs. 32,604 were added to the loan amount as premium charges for Loan Care Insurance Policy thereby making the total l











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top