Anupam Das Gupta, Member—This revision petition and revision petition No.124, filed by the same petitioner against the same principal respondent were considered earlier and disposed of by this Commission’s order dated 30.11.2005, in the following terms:

“Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. None of the respondents are present despite service of the notice by publication and Shri N.K. Roy Choudhury, respondent has already filed an affidavit as well before this Commission. Consequently, the case is being proceeded ex parte against the respondents.

“This order shall dispose of two revision petition Nos. 124 and 125 of 2003. In both the matters similar questions of fact and law have arisen. The difference in the two matters relate to bank drafts (In R.P. No.124 of 2003 Bank Draft No. 574539 of Rs. 1,90,000 and in R.P.No.125 of 2003 Bank Draft No. 574511 of Rs. 2,35,000.)

“These petitions have been filed against the order passed by the Orissa State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Cuttack holding the appellant and the respondent No. 2, Carrier jointly and severally liable to compensate the complainant by paying the amount of Rs. 2,00,000 and compensation of Rs.