K.S.GUPTA, RAJYALAKSHMI RAO
Rajiv Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Helvetia Klinic Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
Mrs. Rajyalakshmi Rao, Member—The present complaint is filed by Mr. Rajiv Sharma-complainant No.1 who is the husband of the deceased Mrs. Rita Sharma; Master Angad Sharma-complainant No.2, who is aged about 10 years and Master Umang Sharma-complainant No.3, who is aged about 8 months and are minor sons of complainant No.1, alleging deficiency in service and medical negligence against opposite party No.1-Helvetia Klinic Pvt. Ltd., where Mrs. Sharma was admitted for delivery of a child; opposite party No. 2—Dr. (Mrs.) Manjit Kocchhar, a Gynaecologist and Obstetrician, who treated Rita Sharma during her pregnancy and performed caesarian operation in O.P. No.1’s clinic, which is owned by Dr. B.R. Sahunja; opposite party No.3-Dr. S.P. Rusia, an Anaesthetist, who was on duty and administered anaesthesia to Rita Sharma for caesarian operation; opposite party No.4-Dr. Kuldeep Singh, an Ultrasonologist, whose services were hired for Ultrasound tests on Rita Sharma at the recommendations of O.P. No. 2.
2. After the complaint was filed, complainants added Mohinder Hospital (opposite party No. 5), where Rita Sharma was transferred from O.P. No.1’s clinic for better facilities, and thereaf
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.