Per S.K. Naik, Member —

Petitioner / complainant/ Dr. P.S. Kalantri in this revision petition is aggrieved that the favourable order he had been able to obtain from the District Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum, Bilaspur, M.P. (District Forum for short) in his complaint against the respondent/opposite party/Wipro G.E. Medical Systems Ltd., has been set aside by the Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Raipur (State Commission for short) and his complaint has been dismissed.

2. The petitioner - complainant, who is running a diagnostic center at Bilaspur, before the District Forum had alleged that from the respondent/opposite party/Wipro G.E. Medical Systems Ltd. he had purchased RT 3200 Advantage II Ultrasound Medical System during the year 1992. His allegations were that the supplier/opposite party had charged him Rs. 8,25,000 / - whereas a similar system was provided to another Dr. M. Parvez Khan at Rs. 6,65,000/-. It had further been alleged that a locally manufactured camera was supplied to him against the promise of supply of original inbuilt camera. Alleging deficiency in service and unfair trade practice, a compensation of Rs. 3,16,000/- as amount